Attorneys and Non-Profit Boards: The Perfect Match

Estates & Trusts No Comments »

The following article was written by James A. List, Esq. and recently published in the Maryland Bar Bulletin.

Almost every non-profit organization has attorneys on their Boards of Directors or Trustees. A review of the boards of the largest non-profits in the region is a “Who’s Who” of the Maryland Bar. This is also true for private schools, small family foundations, and churches and synagogues. For example, The Arc Baltimore just added two attorneys to its Board, bringing the total to five of the 26 Board slots.

Why so many lawyers? In short, it makes sense. For the non-profit, they receive the benefit of legal counsel, often for free. Counsel has the ability to guide an organization on issues such as employment law, corporate law, immigration matters, and health care and government regulations. Attorneys understand complex contracts and can review loan documentation and credit agreements. Board attorneys can work with the organization’s paid advisors and provide input on tax compliance, gift acceptance policies, employee handbooks, and endowment guidelines.

By definition, non-profits have the public interest at heart. They address specific social, educational, or religious objectives. In part due to their mission, many advocates in the non-profit world are not comfortable with confrontation.

Attorneys, however, are problem solvers, by nature and by training.

They understand conflict resolution. And they deal with difficult issues all of the time - people generally do not call their attorney when they are having a good day. Boards seek out these advocacy and mediation skills for their organizations.

Attorneys play another important role on non-profit boards:  access to donors.  Many law firms in the region have their own foundations or charitable plans.  This is the Maryland Bar at its best.  Some firms suggest how much time and money each attorney should contribute to the foundation or other charities.  The competition for non-profit dollars is at an all-time high, with the proliferation of non-profits and the recent economic downturn.  This requires charitable, religious, and educational organizations to be more aggressive and more creative than ever before just to survive.  Law firms and their attorneys can be a great direct revenue source.

Attorneys also have clients with access to capital. Positive charitable and community exposure is a cornerstone of some businesses’ marketing strategy - think Avon and breast cancer. And these corporate sponsorships are critical for the non-profit. These sponsorships not only provide funding for programs and events, but also spur their competition to react.  Businesses do not want to be left out in the cold when their competitors are being featured as a positive community partner.

Because of what we do, attorneys often have access to high net-worth individuals. There are many estate and trust planning techniques that involve the use of charities and charitable foundations. Because of the favorable tax treatment charitable deductions receive, coupling a wealthy individual’s tax planning with their charitable intents provides a positive result for all parties.  Non-profits need to tap into these clients and this expertise.

Why do attorneys participate on non-profit boards to such an extent? It is not pure altruism.  The profession expects us to work for the public good: pro bono publico. Some law firms require such participation. The Bar requires its members to report their non-profit endeavors each year.

There is more to it, however.  Most attorneys realize that they have been fortunate, and they want to give back.  As a whole, attorneys have opportunities not always available to others for education, employment, and lifestyle.  Many attorneys provide services to non-profits in recognition of the privilege that they have been afforded.

Despite our relative comfort and status, there is a lot of dissatisfaction in the legal world. The legal profession is stressful, and attorneys deal with life’s unfortunate occurrences every day:  death, accidents, divorce, crime, disability, etc. Attorneys deal with life’s problems.  There is financial pressure, whether you are a partner at a major law firm or a solo practitioner. The level of job frustration and stress result in disturbing realities in our profession, like high rates of divorce, alcoholism, and other substance abuse. Maryland attorneys are fortunate that the Bar has taken a very proactive and positive approach to addressing these problems.

Board service also combats the negative aspects of the profession.  Board service provides attorneys with the opportunity to use their skills and training in a different context. Many attorneys publicly state that the energy expended on their non-profit service is the most rewarding aspect of their professional life. Winning cases and completing transactions can be satisfying, but raising money for a worthy charity, lobbying for legislation for people with disabilities, or helping a family during the holidays often provides a greater sense of accomplishment.

James A. List is the current President of The Arc Baltimore and the founding member of The Law Offices of James A. List, LLC.

Benelogic Loses $3 Million Lawsuit Against Former Chief Strategic Officer

Business & Corporate Law No Comments »

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ray Weiss or Jessica Trzyna

443-451-7144 or rweiss@weissprassociates.com

BENELOGIC LOSES $3 MILLION LAWSUIT

AGAINST FORMER CHIEF STRATEGIC OFFICER

BALTIMORE, MD (9/22/11) — Lutherville, MD-based Benelogic, a provider of online benefits enrollment solutions, has lost a $3 million lawsuit the company had filed against its former Chief Strategic Officer (CSO) and start-up company. All counts of this lawsuit, which alleged that this executive breached his fiduciary duty to Benelogic, were decided in favor of the defendants by Baltimore County Circuit Court Judge H. Patrick Stringer, Jr.

Judge Stringer noted, “The Court … finds no persuasive evidence … that the damages claimed by Benelogic resulted from any of the alleged breaches of duty by the defendant.”

Benelogic had contended that the defendant covertly created a competing company, recruited Benelogic employees to work for it and solicited current and prospective Benelogic customers for his new company, and misappropriated Benelogic’s trade secrets. None of these contentions were proven.

In his opinion, however, Judge Stringer ruled specifically that the former CSO did not breach his employment agreement and did not usurp any of Benelogic’s corporate opportunities, customers, employees, or trade secrets. Further, the Court’s opinion affirmed that the defendant and his team had provided value to Benelogic commensurate with their work, and that the acts of preparation for a new company were permissible under Maryland law. “The plaintiff has not proved any loss due to the formation…,” stated Judge Stringer’s opinion.

“This lawsuit and the harsh accusations made by Benelogic in court pleadings, correspondence, and to third parties - many of them personal in nature - have done irreparable harm to my client’s reputation, and this lawsuit was costly to defend,” said attorney James A. List, who handled the defense for the defendants.

List added that in November 2010, Benelogic CEO Matthew T. Oros testified that Benelogic was forced to lay off nine employees because of financial difficulties while continuing to fund this litigation. That litigation began in 2009 when Benelogic attempted to get a temporary restraining order issued against the defendants on two occasions, both of which were unsuccessful.

After amending its complaint against the defendants four times and conducting extensive discovery, including numerous depositions, throughout 2009, the case finally went to trial in May 2010 and continued through January 2011, punctuated by several postponements and extensions. Benelogic put on testimony, including expert testimony, for approximately 25 trial days, while the defense called witnesses in response for only five trial days.

The Law Offices of James A. List, LLC is a mid-Atlantic law firm serving business owners; families with developmentally disabled members; and individuals with real estate, estate planning, asset protection and trust needs. The cornerstone of the firm is its personal, responsive customer service.

# # #

The Law Offices of James A. List, LLC 401 Washington Avenue, Suite 802, Towson, MD 21204 | 410 • 337 • 5340
sitemap